Focus Unit

대순진리회와 유가의 해원, 보은, 상생관에 대한 비교연구

양즈루 1 ,
Zi-Lu Yang 1 ,
Author Information & Copyright
1서남대학 정치와 공공관리학원 종교연구소ㆍ강사
1School of Political Science and Public Administration of Southwest university
Corresponding Author : , E-mail : aayzl@foxmail.com.

ⓒ Copyright 2015, The Daesoon Academy of Sciences. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 31, 2014; Accepted: May 21, 2015

Published Online: Jun 01, 2017

ABSTRACT

Grievance resolution, gratitude and mutual beneficence are not only an essential dogma of Daesoonjinrihoe but also a major issue which Chinese Confucian scholars have been concerned about. In this context, this study compares the perspectives of grievance resolution, gratitude, mutual beneficence based on basic scriptures of Daesoonjinrihoe and ancient Chinese Confucianism. With nurture and benevolence as core thoughts, the ways of ruling the world in righteousness and proprieties have common characteristics of Daesoonjinrihoe and Confucianism. The Heavenly Way, which is rather an abstract conception, is perceived as a Confucianism ultimate ground. Because Confucianism does what is right for nurture, embracing rationality, the religious aspects are not clearly defined, it is the difference between Daesoonjinrihoe and Chinese Confucianism. In this regard, this study compares similarities and differences between the two cultures to promote mutual understanding.

Keywords: Daesoonjinrihoe; Confucianism; Grievance resolution; Gratitude; Mutual beneficence

참고문헌(References)

1.

大巡宗教文化研究所编, 『典经』, 韩国:大巡真理会出版部, 2010年版。.

2.

大巡宗教文化研究所编, 『大巡指针』, 韩国:大巡真理会出版部, 2010年版。.

3.

大巡宗教文化研究所编, 『大巡真理会要览』, 韩国:大巡真理会出版部, 2010年版。.

4.

[清]阮元校刻,『十三经注疏』,北京:中华书局,1980年版。.

5.

[宋]朱熹,『四书章句集注』,北京:中华书局,1983年版。.

6.

黄寿祺、张善文,『周易译注』,上海:上海古籍出版社,1993年版。.