The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences
The Daesoon Academy of Sciences
Article

종교조직 유형론으로 본 대순진리회 유형 연구

김항제1,
Hang-Je Kim1,
1선문대학교ㆍ교수
1Sunmoon University
Corresponding Author : Hang-Je Kim

ⓒ Copyright 2015, The Daesoon Academy of Sciences. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 31, 2015 ; Accepted: Oct 06, 2015

Published Online: Jun 01, 2017

ABSTRACT

Typology of religious organization is a useful analysis from the stand point of sociology of region. A study on the change of type of religious organization according to typology is a academic responsibility. This study can also make a religion prepare theoretical shape for the future of the religion.

Although Daesoonjinrihoe now becomes a established sect, Daesoonjinrihoe should retain characteristics as a alternative sect. This feature as a alternative sect is an important identity of Daesoonjinrihoe which was established to criticize and overcome established sect.

Dotongjingyeong is an ideal world of Daesoonjinrihoe. The foundation of Dotongjingyeong as an ideal world is essential value and reason of existence of Daesoonjinrihoe. For this reason, Daesoon jinrihoe should not just maintain its position but lead to reach the Dotongjingyeong here and now.

Dotongjingyeong which should be built here and now is beyond Daesoonjinrihoe as a religious organization, because Dotong- jingyeong is new heaven and new earth. Daesoonjinrihoe should put an guard against trial and error through change of type. Otherwise, Daesoonjinrihoe can not retain characteristics as an alternative sector. Now Daesoonjinrihoe may be at a revolutionary turning point for the foundation of Dotongjingyeong.

Keywords: Daesoonjinrihoe; Typology of Religious Organization; Established Church; Sect; Established Sect; Dotongjingyeong; The Change of Type

참고문헌(References)

1.

대순진리회 교무부, 『대순지침』, 여주: 대순진리회 출판부, 2012.

2.

대순진리회 교무부, 『전경』, 여주: 대순진리회 출판부, 2012.

3.

고병철, 「대순진리회의 전개와 특징」, 한국학중앙연구원 문화와 종교연구소, 『한국종교교단연구 II』, 성남: 한국학종앙연구원, 2007.

4.

김종서, 『종교사회학』, 서울: 서울대학교출판부, 2006.

5.

김항제, 『통일교의학 I』, 아산: 선문대출판부, 2002.

6.

김홍철 외, 『한국신종교의 개벽사상』, 익산: 원광대학교 종교문제연구소, 2012.

7.

노길명, 『한국신흥종교연구』, 서울: 경세원, 1996.

8.

대순사상학술원, 『대순사상논총』 1~24집, 포천: 대진대학교 출판부, 2014.

9.

박광수 외, 『신종교연구의 방법론과 과제』, 익산: 원광대학교 종교문제연구소, 2013.

10.

박상규, 「대순진리회 조직과 그 특성」, 『종교연구』 70, 2013.

11.

비판사회학회 엮음, 『사회학: 비판적 사회읽기』, 서울: 도서출판 한울, 2012.

12.

오경환, 『종교사회학』, 서울: 서광사, 1986.

13.

윤택림, 『문화와 역사 연구를 위한 질적연구방법론』, 서울: 아르케, 2005.

14.

이경원, 『한국 신종교와 대순사상』, 서울: 문사철, 2011.

15.

이경원, 『대순종학원론』, 서울: 문사철, 2013.

16.

이원규, 『종교사회학의 이해』, 서울: 도서출판 나남, 2010.

17.

정규훈, 『한국의 신종교』, 서울: 서광사, 2001.

18.

캐서린 벨, 『의례의 이해』, 류성민 옮김, 오산: 한신대학교 출판부, 2013.

19.

토마스 F. 오데아, 『종교사회학입문』, 권규식 역, 서울: 대한기독교서회, 1976.

20.

Becker, Howard, Systematic Sociology, New York: Jone Wiley & Sons, 1932.

21.

Bellah, Robert N., Beyond Belief, New York: Harper&Row, 1970.

22.

Clarke, Peter B., eds., Encyclopedia of New Religions Movements, London: Routledge, 2006.

23.

Clarke, Peter B., New Religions in Global Perspective, London: Routledge, 2006.

24.

Glock, Charles Y. and Rodney Stark, Religion and Society in Tension, Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 1965.

25.

Hill, Michael., A Sociology of Religion, London: Heinemann, 1980.

26.

Hoekema, Anthony A., The Four Major Cults, Michigan: W&E Publishing Co., 1986.

27.

Niebuhr, H. Richard, The Social Sources of Denominationalism, New York: The World Publishing Co., 1957.

28.

Partridge, Christopher, New Religions A Guide, New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.

29.

Robertson, Roland, The Sociological Interpretation of Religion, New York: Schocken Books Inc., 1984.

30.

Sweat, Anthony., Mormons An Open Book, IN: Ensign Peak, 2012.

31.

Weber, Max, The Sociology of Religion, trans. E. Fischoff, Boston: Beacon Press, 1963.

32.

Wilson, Bryan R., Religious Sects, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

33.

Yinger, J. Milton, Religion in the Struggle for Power, Durham: Duke Univ., 1970.

34.

http://www.idaesoon.or.kr.

35.

http://www.daos.or.kr.

36.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3HO.

37.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutterite.

38.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_Dance).

39.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quakers.