대순사상에서의 무극(無極)과 태극(太極) 그리고 대순(大巡)의 의미 고찰

박재현¹^,^†

A Study on the Meaning of Mugeuk(無極) and Taegeuk(太極) in Daesoon Thoughts

Jae-Hyun Park¹^,^†

¹성균관대학교ㆍ교수

¹Sungkyunkwan University

^†Corresponding Author : Jae-Hyun Park

ⓒ Copyright 2014, The Daesoon Academy of Sciences. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Aug 31, 2013 ; Accepted: Mar 09, 2014

Published Online: Jun 01, 2017

ABSTRACT

Identifying the ontological characteristics of "ultimate reality" is highly important in a specific religion or thought because it is believed to contain the logic that explain the wholistic phenomenon in the entire universe. The "ultimate reality" is called "Lee(理)", "Dao(道)", "Taegeuk; the Great Ultimate(太極)", "Mugeuk; Non-Ultimate(無極)", "Gong(空)", "Haven", "SangJe(上帝)", "God" in many different religions or thoughts.

Taegeuk(太極), Mugeuk(無極) and Daesoon(大巡) are believed to contain the logic that explain the wholistic phenomenon in the entire universe in Daesoon Thoughts which we can see in the GooCheon SangJe(九天上帝)'s saying that "Even if the logic is so high, it comes from the surface of Taegeuk and Mugeuk and cannot be separated from every phenomenon in our life(理雖高出於太極无極之表不離乎日用事物之間)" and Doju(道主) Cho, Jeong San's saying that "The reasion that Dao is called Dao is that it is settled to be Mugeuk and moved to be Taegeuk(道之謂道也者定而无極動而太極)" and Dojeon(都典) Park Wu-dang's saying that "Daesoon(大巡) is circle(圓), circle is Mugeuk(無極), Mugeuk is Taegeuk(太極)".

Mugeuk contains the logic of transcendence and Taegeuk contains the logic of immanance. And Nae-confucianism admit the Ultimate Reality or logic have both characteries of Mugeuk and Taegeuk and don't admit that Taegeuk comes from Mugeuk. Therefore, Mugeuk and Taegeuk are in complementary relations.

These Nae-confucianism's idea about Mugeuk and Taegeuk corresponds with Deasoon Thought. Daesoon Thoughts also admit that Ultimate Reality, GooCheon SangJe can be understood with both Mugeuk and Taegeuk. That is, GooCheon SangJe, the Suprime God is transcendent from this world(Mugeuk) and also manage the whole universe using the logic of Taegeuk(太極). Daesoon(大巡) unite Mugeuk and Taegeuk using the concept of circulation.

The logic of Mugeuk and Taegeuk is both two as well as one, and one as well as two. It is not dualism nor monism. It is non-dualism and super-dualism. These logic of coexistence is the core of Mugeuk and Taegeuk. And this logic is reflexed in Daesoon Thoughts' core proposition that "Daesoon(大巡) is circle(圓), circle is Mugeuk(無極), Mugeuk is Taegeuk(太極)".

Keywords: Daesoon Thoughts(大巡思想); Mugeuk(無極); Taegeuk (太極); Daesoon(大巡); Taegeuk Diagram(太極圖說); Chou Lien-hsi(周濂溪); Zhuxi(朱子)

참고문헌(References)

대순진리회 교무부, 『전경』, 여주: 대순진리회 출판부, 1974.

대순진리회 교무부, 『대순진리회 요람』, 여주: 대순진리회 출판부. 2010.

김상일, 『동학과 신서학』, 서울: 지식산업사, 2000.

김상일, 『역과 탈현대의 논리』, 서울: 지식산업사, 2007.

김용규, 『서양문명을 읽는 코드 신』, 서울: 휴머니스트, 2010.

김 탁, 「증산 강일순의 공사사상」, 한국정신문화연구원 박사학위 논문, 1995.

김학권, 「주돈이 철학의 연구」, 『원광대학교 논문집』, 1996.

김한상, 「주희 성리학(性理學)의 형이상학적 특색과 현대 철학, 『범한철학회논문집』 60, 2011.

박재현, 「대순진리회의 신앙의 대상에 대한 연구: 종교철학적 방법론을 중심으로」, 대진대학교 석사학위 논문, 2013.

10.

오강남, 『종교, 심층을 보다』, 서울: 현암사, 2011.

11.

장윤수, 「한국 성리학에서 '무극태극'논쟁」, 『철학연구』 61, 1997.

12.

전라북도, 『無極大道敎槪況』, 일본학습원대학 동양문화연구소 소장, 1925; 대순종교문화연구소 번역본.

13.

정병련, 「晦齋와 忘機堂의 無極太極論爭」, 『한중철학』, 1996.

14.

조현성, 「주돈이 사상의 이해를 위한 몇 가지 단서」, 『동양철학연구』 54, 2008.

15.

주광호ㆍ주돈이, 「태극도설의 존재론적 가치론적 함의」, 『한국철학논집』 20, 2007.

16.

차선근, 「종단 대순진리회의 변천 과정과 무극 태극의 관계」, 『대순회보』 94, 2009.

17.

태극도 본부, 「취지서」, 『태극도 통감』, 부산: 태극도, 1956.